Call Us: 020 8771 5254
Amphlett Lissimore Logo

Back to Blog

Who gets the dog in divorce? FI v DO [2024] EWFC 384 (B)

Published on

January 20, 2025

Who gets the dog in divorce?

Estella Newbold-Brown, partner and head of family law, discusses a recent case where the couple’s beloved dog was considered in their divorce settlement over and above it being a chattel.

FI v DO [2024] EWFC 384 (B)

The case of FI v DO [2024] EWFC 384 (B), was adjudicated on 20 December 2024. It primarily addressed the financial remedies application following the dissolution of the marriage between FI and DO. The central asset in contention was the former matrimonial home (FMH). The focus of the case including housing, maintenance, fairness and who should get the dog.

Although the primary focus of the Judge was on the division of the FMH, the court also considered the welfare of the couple’s dog, which had been a significant part of the parties’ life and their children. In family law, pets are typically regarded as personal property i.e. chattel; however, in this case, the emotional attachment and the role of pets in family dynamics influenced the court’s decision making process.

In this instance, the court considered factors such as who was the primary caregiver of the dog, the living arrangements post-separation, and the best environment for the dog’s well-being. Ultimately, the court decided that the dog should remain with FI, who had been the primary caregiver (for the last 18 months) and that this home was the ‘safe place’ where the dog ‘belonged’. In essence, this arrangement meet the dog’s needs.

Why is this case so important?

This decision underscores the court’s recognition of the unique status pets hold within families, balancing legal principles with the practical aspects of the pet’s welfare. The court’s approach in this case reflects an understanding of pet’s sentimental value and the importance of their well-being in post-separation arrangements. Perhaps there is more of a shift towards how pets are in treated in European court. In any event, this decision is very much welcomed in the family law industry.

About the Author

Estella Newbold-Brown is a partner and Head of Family Law team at Amphlett Lissimore. Estella specialises in financial arrangements following a separation. An animal lover herself, Estella has a keen interest in pet-nups and has recently joined forces with Sarah Lucy Cooper to form a steering group of 20+ lawyers and barristers all looking to change the law that sees pets as chattels and not as an integral part of the family as they should be.

Further reading

LPA – More important than your Will?

January 31, 2025

Could sorting your Lasting Powers of Attorney be more important than writing a Will? Judith Hurle, a Will Executive at our West Wickham office, discusses the merits of obtaining Lasting Powers of Attorney sooner rather than later.

Read More

Is family mediation legally binding?

January 30, 2025

Family mediation is seen as a cost-effective route for a couple who are separating to discuss and agree on their financial and child arrangements. But is family mediation legally binding? Can a court order me to participate in Family Mediation? Accredited Family Mediator, Sam O’Dwyer discusses MIAMs and the legalities of family mediation. What is […]

Read More

Removal of the two-year ownership rule

January 31, 2025

Earlier this month, Matthew Pennycook, MP for Greenwich and Woolwich and Minister of State for ...

Read More

Estella Newbold-Brown listed in Citywealth’s Top 75 Family Lawyers List 2025

January 23, 2025

This week, Citywealth magazine released its 2025 list of Top 75 Family Lawyers in the UK’s ...

Read More