Call Us: 020 8771 5254
Amphlett Lissimore Logo

Back to Blog

Why can’t I have custody of the dog?

Written by

Karen Bowey


Published on

March 13, 2023

Karen Bowey, a chartered legal executive in our family team discusses how a beloved pet is treated in the same way as a fridge freezer in English family law.

I was interested to read that one-half of Ant and Dec (being Ant McPartlin) is being taken back to court by his former wife, Lisa Armstrong for full-time “custody” of their beautiful chocolate Labrador. Previously, it seems, during their divorce proceedings, they had reached an agreement as to “shared care” of their beloved pooch, but now that circumstances have changed – Ant has two dogs with his now wife – Ms Armstrong wants full-time care. It made me think about how pets are treated in divorce proceedings in England and Wales. Contrary to some other jurisdictions – we are, in my view, behind – in English family law, a pet is a chattel – a thing – like a fridge freezer, the TV or that hideous vase that might have been a present from someone. A pet is therefore treated as such, and you won’t find a family court in this jurisdiction making findings as to which household the pet may enjoy a better standard of living.

Only in January 2022 did Spanish law change to recognise pets as sentient beings. This has resulted in pets within divorce proceedings being treated like children in that the pet’s welfare will be considered before the court orders where it is to live. This even goes so far as to consider how a pet has been treated by a party during the marriage when deciding matters relating to children.

Even in the USA, many states are slowly recognising that pets cannot be treated the same as chattels.

For the time being, we have to apply the law we have. It follows, therefore, that reaching an agreement with your ex as to arrangements for a pet can only be a good thing. Mediation is an ideal way of resolving issues and I would certainly recommend it as a forum for such discussions. Of course if you want to think ahead, you could prepare a “pet-nup” – a bit like a pre-nuptial agreement but, naturally, for your pets.

It would record what you agree between you should happen to your pets should your relationship come to an end. Without knowing the ins and outs of the McPartlin/Armstrong financial settlement, it’s difficult to assess how an application back to court can be made. We can only hope that sense prevails, that an agreement is reached, and that Hurley (the dog) doesn’t have his life turned upside down by it.

Further reading

Can you choose to have your parental responsibility terminated?

December 4, 2023

It’s rare that a parent would request for their parental responsibility to be terminated. But in GF (A Minor), Re [2023] EWFC 203, this is what happened.

Read More

Property Trader Stamp Duty Exemption – Total Exemption what a relief!

November 23, 2023

Partner and Head of Commercial property, Katy Moss, discusses the criteria needed to qualify for the Property Trader Stamp Duty Exemption.

Read More

Resolution launches its Vision for Family Justice

November 27, 2023

This year, to celebrate its 40th Anniversary, Resolution is using its annual Awareness Week to ...

Read More

Leasehold and Freehold Bill announced in the King’s Speech

November 10, 2023

On Tuesday 7th November 2023, the Leasehold and Freehold Bill was announced during King Charles’ first ...

Read More